Skip Navigation


European Journal of Echocardiography Advance Access originally published online on July 23, 2007
European Journal of Echocardiography 2008 9(3):351-355; doi:10.1016/j.euje.2007.05.004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
9/3/351    most recent
j.euje.2007.05.004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jiamsripong, P.
Right arrow Articles by Lester, S. J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jiamsripong, P.
Right arrow Articles by Lester, S. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2007. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Three methods for evaluation of left atrial volume

Panupong Jiamsripong1, Tadaaki Honda1, Christina S. Reuss1, R. Todd Hurst1, Hari P. Chaliki1, Diane E. Grill2, Stephen L. Schneck1, Rochelle Tyler1, Bijoy K. Khandheria1 and Steven J. Lester1,*

1 Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, 13400 East Shea Boulevard, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA
2 Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

Received 3 January 2007; accepted after revision 10 May 2007; online publish-ahead-of-print 23 July 2007.

* Corresponding author. E-mail address: lester.steven{at}mayo.edu (S.J. Lester).


  Abstract

Aim: To compare and contrast 3 different echocardiographic methods used to measure left atrial (LA) volume: biplane area length (AL), biplane modified Simpson (SIMP), and prolate ellipse (PE) methods.

Methods and results: A review of consecutive patients who presented to our outpatient echocardiography laboratory for a resting transthoracic study between April 2006 and May 2006 was performed. Echocardiograms were reexamined and LA volume measured using the AL, SIMP, and PE methods. Of 102 consecutive patients evaluated, 97 had a measure of LA volume using all 3 methods. A significant difference in the measurement of mean ± SD LA volume was noted among the 3 different methods: 37 ± 16 mL/m2 for AL, 34 ± 14 mL/m2 for SIMP, and 27 ± 12 mL/m2 for PE. The PE method yielded routinely smaller values compared with either the AL or SIMP method (P < 0.001). Differences increased with increased LA volume. The SIMP method derived consistently smaller (<5 mL/m2) values than those of the AL method, consistent across the full range of LA volumes.

Conclusion: Significant differences exist among these 3 commonly used methods for measuring LA volume. Standardization of the measurement of LA volume is recommended.

Keywords: Cardiac volume; Echocardiography; Heart atria


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.