© 2004 by European Society of Cardiology
Copyright © 2003, The European Society of Cardiology
Myocardial contrast echocardiography: advantages of quantitative analysis
CNR Clinical Physiology Institute, San Cataldo Research Area, Via Moruzzi 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy
Received 21 October 2003; received in revised form 22 October 2003; accepted after revision 22 October 2003.
* Tel.: +39-050-315-2216; fax: +39-050-315-2166. drovai@ifc.cnr.it
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Please see page 41 for the article by Sieswerda et al. (doi: 10.1016/j.euje.2003.08.005) to which this editorial pertains.
Every technology yet to be consolidated needs to be compared with reference methods to evaluate its accuracy. Over the past years, contrast echocardiography has been compared against a variety of standards. In experimental studies, myocardial perfusion data from ultrasound have been compared with the measurements of coronary blood flow obtained by labeled microspheres, or with infarct size following myocardial tissue staining. In initial clinical studies, hand-made contrast agents have
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
Related articles in Eur J Echocardiogr:
- Quantitative evaluation of myocardial perfusion in patients with revascularized myocardial infarction: comparison between intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography and 99mTc-sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography
- Gertjan Tj Sieswerda, Lucas J Klein, Otto Kamp, Eric A Aiazian, Wolfgang Lepper, Frans C Visser, Peter Hanrath, and Cees A Visser
Eur J Echocardiogr 2004 5: 41-50.[Abstract] [FREE Full Text]