Skip Navigation

European Journal of Echocardiography 2008 9(2):338-341; doi:10.1093/ejechocard/jen017
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abdelmoneim, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Mulvagh, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abdelmoneim, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Mulvagh, S. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiography. All rights reserved. © The Author 2008. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Myocardial contrast echocardiography in biopsy-proven primary cardiac amyloidosis

Sahar S. Abdelmoneim, Mathieu Bernier, Diego Bellavia, Imran S. Syed, Sunil V. Mankad, Krishnaswamy Chandrasekaran, Patricia A. Pellikka and Sharon L. Mulvagh*

Mayo Cardiovascular Ultrasound Imaging and Hemodynamic Laboratory, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA

Received 15 October 2007; accepted after revision 2 January 2008.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +1 507 284 8612. E-mail address: smulvagh{at}mayo.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Supplementary material
 References
 
Cardiac vasculature is affected in 88–90% of patients with primary cardiac amyloidosis (CA). Myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) relies on the ultrasound detection of microbubble contrast agents that are solely confined to the intravascular space, and are therefore useful in the evaluation of flow in the microvasculature. This is the first case report describing the use of MCE during vasodilator stress to evaluate coronary flow reserve in a patient with biopsy-proven primary CA and angiographically normal coronaries. Qualitative MCE demonstrated delayed replenishment of microbubbles during peak stress; quantitative analysis was consistent with a reduction in total myocardial blood flow and reserve values. Comparative imaging modalities including strain and strain rate imaging, magnetic resonance imaging, and myocardial scintigraphy were suggestive to the diagnosis of CA. In conclusion, MCE is a method for recognition of microvascular dysfunction, and might be considered as a useful tool to augment echocardiographic assessment in the early diagnosis of CA.

Keywords: Amyloidosis; Contrast; Echocardiography


A 62-year-old man presented with weight loss and worsening fatigue. Past medical history was unremarkable. Physical examination was normal. A 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) revealed normal sinus rhythm with low anteroseptal forces. Transthoracic echocardiography demonstrated normal wall motion of the left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV) with mildly increased LV wall thicknesses (LV septum and posterior wall thickness of 14 mm) (Figure 1, see Supplementary material online, Movies 1 and 2). Estimated LV ejection fraction (EF) was 61% with LV diastolic dysfunction (pseudo normal transmitral pattern; Grade 2 of 4). Global Doppler myocardial imaging (DMI) studies were done, which demonstrated marked impairment particularly in the lateral and anteroseptal walls, with a mean tissue velocity of 2.9 ± 3.5 cm/s, mean strain of –9.7 ± 7.8% and strain rate of –0.8 ± 0.6 (1/s). These findings were consistent with the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis (CA). Serum and urine samples showed elevated lambda light-chain proteins. Bone marrow biopsy and subcutaneous fat aspirate showed amyloid deposits, confirmed by Congo red stain. Cardiac magnetic resonant imaging (MRI) was performed to evaluate CA further. Steady-state free precession (SSFP) cine-sequences demonstrated diffuse LV and RV thickening (Figure 2A and B, see Supplementary material online, Movie 3). First-pass MRI (bolus of 0.1 mmol/kg gadolinium-DTPA) revealed normal perfusion at rest. Delayed enhancement images (bolus of 0.2 mmol/kg gadolinium-DTPA) demonstrated poor signal to noise, an unusual dark appearance of the blood pool, and suboptimally nulled myocardium with mild diffuse heterogeneous but predominantly subendocardial hyperenhancement (Figure 2C). These MRI findings are consistent with CA. On coronary angiography, no epicardial atherosclerosis was noted and dominant vessel was the right coronary artery. RV endomyocardial biopsy confirmed amyloid depositions that were only positive for lambda immunoglobulin light chains. These depositions included severe interstitial and pericellular involvement with non-obstructive vascular deposits and focal endocardial deposits. All these findings confirmed the diagnosis of AL-type amyloidosis. Real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) was used during an established research protocol with adenosine stress (Adenoscan; Astellas, USA: dose of 140 µg/kg/min over 6 min). After obtaining informed consent, MCE was performed using Definity® (BMS, USA). Microbubble destruction replenishment imaging sequences were performed using SONOS 7500, power modulation (Philips Medical System, Best, The Netherlands). Qualitative MCE revealed normal homogenous contrast perfusion at rest (Figure 3, see Supplementary material online, Movie 4). Despite normal wall motion at peak adenosine stress, a moderate decrease in myocardial perfusion of the apical regions in apical four chamber, and apical two chamber views by the second beat post microbubble destruction (flash) was noted, which eventually perfused by the 8th beat post destruction (delayed perfusion) (Figure 4, see Supplementary material online, Movie 5). Quantitatively, replenishment of contrast characterized by time intensity curves fitted to the monoexponential function y = A(1–e–βt) was derived, where β is the slope of the replenishment curve, reflecting microbubble velocity, and the plateau (A) of microbubble videointensity reflects microvascular cross section area (Figure 5). To adjust for inhomogeneous contrast enhancement of the myocardium, segmental videointensity was corrected for the blood pool cavity videointensity (Amyocardium/Acavity) for each segment. The MCE-derived value of absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF = A x β) and their reserve values (stress/rest) were calculated. The median MBF derived from 16 LV segments was 0.515 [interquartile range (IRQ); 0.303, 0.886] at rest, and was 0.412 (IRQ; 0.246, 1.137) at peak stress. Coronary flow reserve value was 0.780 (IRQ; 0.326, 1.935). Two cycles of Melphalan/dexamethasone chemotherapy were initiated while preparing for stem cell collection and transplant. The patient tolerated the chemotherapy well with partial response of drop of lambda free light chain from 11.9 to 4.7 mg/dL and 24 h urine protein drop from 6 to 3 gm.


Figure 1
View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1 Transthoracic echocardiogram (Harmonic imaging); (A) four-chamber view and (B) two-chamber view showing increased thickening of the left and right ventricular myocardium. LV, left ventricle; RV, right ventricle; LA, left atrium; RA, right atrium.

 


Figure 2
View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2 Cardiac magnetic resonant imaging; four-chamber steady-state free precession images in end-diastole (A) and end-systole (B) demonstrates diffuse right and left ventricular thickening. The tricuspid valve is also thickened (best appreciated in the end-systolic frame). Image artifact partially obscures the mitral valve. (C) Mid-ventricular short-axis delayed enhancement acquisition demonstrates suboptimal myocardial nulling, an unusually dark appearance of the blood pool, and mild diffuse heterogenous but predominantly subendocardial hyper enhancement (arrow).

 


Figure 3
View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3 Baseline (rest) myocardial contrast echocardiography (subsequent end-systolic frames) in apical two-chamber view showing homogenous contrast replenishment of the myocardium by the 5th beat post destruction.

 


Figure 4
View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 4 Adenosine stress myocardial contrast echocardiography (subsequent end-systolic frames) in apical two-chamber view showing a perfusion defect at the apex (arrow) at the 2nd beat post destruction; this replenishes gradually by the 8th beat (delayed perfusion).

 


Figure 5
View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 5 Adenosine stress myocardial contrast echocardiography (subsequent end-systolic frames) with apical region of interest for quantification (apical two-chamber view) and replenishment curve with slope (β) and plateau value (A) fitted to a monoexponential function. (A) Baseline; (B) stress where the slope and plateau are decreased in comparison with the curve at baseline.

 
This is the first case report describing the use of MCE during vasodilator stress in a patient with biopsy-proven primary CA and angiographically normal coronaries. Clinical evidence of cardiac involvement occurs in up to 50% of patients with AL amyloidosis. Cardiac vasculature is affected in 88–90% of patients with primary CA.1,2 Intramural amyloid deposition within the coronary arteries leads to vessel wall thickening and luminal narrowing.3 Previous studies reported impairment of endothelial-dependent (acetylcholine) and endothelial-independent (adenosine) coronary flow reserve in patients with amyloidosis who presented with chest pain and normal angiogram with no clinical or biochemical evidence of amyloidosis at the time of presentation.4 In conclusion, MCE is a method for recognition of microvascular dysfunction, and might be considered as a useful tool to augment echocardiographic assessment in the early diagnosis of CA.


    Supplementary material
 Top
 Abstract
 Supplementary material
 References
 
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found in the online version.

Conflict of interest: none declared.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Supplementary material
 References
 

  1. Shah KB, Inoue Y, Mehra MR. Amyloidosis and the heart: a comprehensive review. Arch Intern Med (2006) 166:1805–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Kwong RY, Falk RH. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in cardiac amyloidosis. Circulation (2005) 111:122–4.[Free Full Text]
  3. Neben-Wittich MA, Wittich CM, Mueller PS, Larson DR, Gertz MA, Edwards WD. Obstructive intramural coronary amyloidosis and myocardial ischemia are common in primary amyloidosis. Am J Med (2005) 118:1287.[Medline]
  4. Al Suwaidi J, Velianou JL, Gertz MA, Cannon RO III, Higano ST, Holmes DR Jr, et al. Systemic amyloidosis presenting with angina pectoris. Ann Intern Med (1999) 131:838–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abdelmoneim, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Mulvagh, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abdelmoneim, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Mulvagh, S. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?