Skip Navigation

European Journal of Echocardiography 2007 8(4):241-246; doi:10.1016/j.euje.2007.02.011
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scohy, T. V.
Right arrow Articles by Bogers, Ad.J.J.C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scohy, T. V.
Right arrow Articles by Bogers, Ad.J.J.C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2007, The European Society of Cardiology

Intraoperative evaluation of micromultiplane transesophageal echocardiographic probe in surgery for congenital heart disease

Thierry V. Scohya,*, Diederik Gommersa, A. Derk Jan ten Harkelb, Yvon Derycka, Jackie McGhiec and Ad.J.J.C. Bogersd

aDepartment of Anesthesiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
bDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
cDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
dDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Received 5 February 2007; accepted after revision 14 February 2007.

t.scohy{at}erasmusmc.nl

* Corresponding author: Department of Anesthesiology, Room Bd 581, Erasmus Medical Center, P.O. BOX 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 324 7351 9413.


    Abstract
 Top
 Notes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Introduction In the last years, transesophageal transducers for multiplane Doppler echocardiography have demonstrated their superior imaging performance in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery. To date, the size of these probes has limited their use in neonates and small children. New technologies allowing performing TEE in smaller patients are therefore promising.

Methods We report our clinical experience with the Oldelft micromultiplane TEE probe (8.2–7mm diameter tip with a 5.2mm diameter shaft) specifically meant for use in neonates.

Results Forty-two patients were examined intra-operatively using the micromulti TEE harmonic transducer. Patients examined ranged in age from 4days to 6years and ranged in weight from 2.5 to 23.8kg. In two patients we had to adapt ventilatory settings because of increased airway resistance after probe insertion. In 3 patients surgical re-intervention was performed due to TEE assessment immediately after weaning from bypass. In two patients significant obstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract was still present after Fallot correction, and one patient had an additional muscular ventricular septal defect still present after VSD closure.

Conclusions The micromulti TEE harmonic transducer provided excellent diagnostic intra-operative TEE in neonates and small children without major complications, special attention should be taken for ventilatory parameters in neonates less than 3kg.

Keywords: TEE; Neonates; Small children


* Financial support: There was no financial support for this study. Back

** Conflict of interest: There was no conflict of interest. Back


    Introduction
 Top
 Notes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The role of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) during surgery for congenital cardiac disease to define complex anatomical structures, functional abnormalities, and to monitor hemodynamics is well established.1,2 Until 1990, intraoperative evaluation of infants and children undergoing congenital heart surgery was not feasible with TEE because probe sizes were too large.1 It is not surprising that inability to pass the TEE probe and complications as esophageal trauma, airway compromise, and aortic compression occur predominantly in smaller children.3 The subsequent development of miniaturized single- and bi-plane probes (from 9mm down to 3.3mm diameter) has generated a number of studies, which have demonstrated that TEE can be performed safely in the pediatric population.4–6 However, the use of a mini multiplane TEE probe (10.7–8.0mm diameter tip with a 7.4mm diameter shaft) is still limited to children above the weight of 5kg.7 A multiplane TEE probe for neonates and small children which obtains images in several planes is an obvious advantage, certainly considering the complexity of the intracardiac defects.8–10 In this study we evaluated the clinical and diagnostic ability of the Oldelft micromulti TEE probe (8.2–7mm diameter tip with a 5.2mm diameter shaft) in neonates and infants undergoing cardiac surgery to provide data on safety and visability.


    Methods
 Top
 Notes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Forty-two consecutive neonates and infants undergoing surgery for congenital cardiac defects at the Erasmus MC Thoraxcentrum were included. All patients undergo routinely TEE during cardiac surgery. Since the availability of the Oldelft micromultiplane TEE probe the weight limit has dropped to 2.5kg.

Before induction of anesthesia, all patients were monitored with a five-lead, two-channel electrocardiogram, non-invasive blood pressure measurement, and pulse oximetry. After the insertion of a peripheral venous line, general anesthesia was induced with midazolam 0.2mg/kg, sufentanil 2mcg/kg and pancuronium 0.15mg/kg. Patients were nasotracheally intubated and pressure controlled ventilated (PCV) using a Siemens 900C ventilator. Anesthesia was maintained with midazolam 0.1mg/kg per hour and sufentanil 1mcg/kg per hour. Invasive monitoring via a femoral arterial line and an internal jugular central venous catheter was performed, and a Foley bladder catheter and rectal temperature probe were inserted. The lubricated Oldelft micromultiplane TEE probe was inserted blindly with or without a jaw thrust of the mandible or under direct laryngoscopic view. During insertion of the TEE probe special attention was payed to tidal volume and dampening of the arterial waveform.3 TEE examinations were performed using Philips iE 33 ultrasound system (Philips, Andover, MA, USA) equipped with 2D, pulsed, continuous, and color Doppler capabilities. All TEE examinations were conducted by the same anaesthesiologist in presence of a second anaesthesiologist who was responsible for the care of the patient.

TEE probe
The micromulti TEE Transducer is a miniature, phased array ultrasound (center frequency 7.5MHz/bandwidth >40%/48 elements/0.1mm pitch) multiplane TEE probe, developed for neonates and small children. The micromultiplane TEE transducer consists of an octagonal 48-element array, 5.0mm elevation, 4.77mm lateral aperture, rotatable through 180° mounted on the distal end of a gastroscope. The micromulti TEE Transducer uses a flexible shaft with a thickness of max 5.2mm, with a length of 70cm, with a bending neck capable of articulating in the anterior and posterior directions (120°±10° upward anterior, 90°±10° backward posterior). The bending neck has a diameter of 5.6mm and a length of 40mm. The bead on the transition to the shaft has a diameter of 6.2mm. The tip is 8.2mm wide, 7.0mm thick and has a length of 24.0mm. Fig. 1 shows a comparison of an adult, the mini multiplane and the micro multiplane TEE probe tips.


Figure 1
View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1 Adult, minimulti and micromulti TEE probe.

 
Complete TEE examination took place before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). After the initial examination, the probe was advanced into the stomach and left in an unlocked position during the procedure; the ultrasound emission was turned off during bypass. The TEE assessment of the surgical repair occurred immediately after weaning from CPB.


    Results
 Top
 Notes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Demographic data are summarized in Table 1. Patients examined ranged in age from 4days to 6years and ranged in weight from 2.5 to 23.8kg. Table 1 also lists the diagnostic information concerning patients who were evaluated before, during and after surgery.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Patient Characteristics

 
None of the patients was excluded beforehand. There were two patients with complications related to introduction of the probe or its use during the surgical procedure. Patient 1 had an increased airway resistance with increased air leak after introduction of the micromulti TEE probe, the problem was solved by increasing PEEP level from 4 to 6cm H2O and increasing peak inspiratory pressure from 10 to 14cm H2O above PEEP. Patient 6 had increased airway resistance after introducing the probe, withdrawal of the nasal endotracheal tube for 0.5cm, and PEEP increase from 4 to 8cm H2O and peak pressure increase from 10 to 18cm H2O solved the problem. In both patients we noticed no further difficulties during TEE examination.

In three patients surgical re-intervention during the continued procedure was decided after intra-operative TEE assessment of the initial repair. Case 21 and 31 had significant RVOT obstruction (continuous-wave Doppler velocities of 4.0m/s) after correction, therefore widening of the RVOT (CW velocities 1.4m/s and 2.0m/s) was performed. Case 14 showed an additional muscular VSD after VSD correction, which was closed subsequently. This reintervention rate is comparable to the 5–10% as reported earlier in pediatric cardiac surgery after TEE assessment.

In two of the larger patients (case 40 and 42, body weight 20 and 24kg) we had poor quality images.


    Discussion
 Top
 Notes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
TEE has become the standard of care in many institutions performing pediatric cardiac surgery, to evaluate the surgical repair after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass. The cardiac performance can be assessed and possible residual lesions can be immediately corrected.11 As surgical techniques have improved, greater numbers of neonatal and small patients are referred for repair of complex intracardiac defects. TEE is frequently used in this population. Due to the relatively large size and rigid nature of TEE probes, airway complications, inadvertent extubation, and insertion failures have been reported to occur predominantly in smaller patients.3 Until recently a safe investigation with multiplane technique in neonates and infants was limited to children of 5kg or more.7 The Oldelft micromultiplane TEE probe provided excellent diagnostic intra-operative TEE in neonates and small children without major complications, this probe allows multiplane imaging in neonates and smaller children and provides additional and clear information, with less manipulation than would be required for biplane visualization. This is illustrated in Figs. 2–7GoGoGoGoGo. In Fig. 2 we measured a flow velocity of 4m/s with continuous wave (CW) Doppler in the pulmonary artery after surgical repair, with the simplified modification of the Bernoulli equation ({Delta}P=4x{Delta}V2) the estimated instantaneous systolic gradient would be 64mmHg. Fig. 3 shows an overriding aorta and VSD in TOF. Fig. 4 shows the RVOT and the pulmonary artery. In Fig. 5 we measured the velocity time integral (VTI) with CW Doppler in a transgastric long-axis view of the aortic valve. Fig. 6 shows color Doppler flow in the left coronary artery (LCA) and Fig. 7 shows a transgastric long-axis view of the aortic valve.


Figure 2
View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2 Continuous wave flow velocity measurement in pulmonary artery in a multiplane angle of 102°.

 


Figure 3
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3 Ventricular septal defect and overriding aorta in tetralogy of Fallot in a multiplane angle of 108°.

 


Figure 4
View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 4 Pulmonary artery in a multiplane angle of 48°.

 


Figure 5
View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 5 CW Doppler VTI measurement through a normal aortic valve in a transgastric long-axis view; multiplane angle 101°.

 


Figure 6
View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 6 Color Doppler flow in left coronary artery in a multiplane angle 14°.

 


Figure 7
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 7 Transgastric long-axis view of the aortic valve in a multiplane angle 105°.

 
In this study we were able to acquire useful images in children down to a weight of 2.5kg, however in two of the larger children (case 40 and 42) we noticed poor quality images. Although in two children ventilatory problems occur they could be resolved by changing ventilatory settings.

In conclusion the Oldelft micromultiplane TEE probe examinations provided excellent diagnostic intraoperative TEE assessment in neonates as small as 2.5kg without major complications. In larger children (>20kg) however we noticed poor image quality, further investigation will have to confirm this.

Immediate TEE assessment of the surgical repair after weaning from bypass may prevent unplanned reoperations in the early and late post operative period. In the smallest infants attention should be payed to ventilatory settings during and after introduction of the micromulti TEE probe. Furthermore intra-operative TEE assessment also provided additional information concerning cardiac performance. This information assisted in taking the appropriate decisions for optimal pharmacologic treatment during weaning of bypass. Intraoperative TEE monitoring is recommended in all cases.


    Notes
 Top
 Notes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
* Financial support: There was no financial support for this study. Back

** Conflict of interest: There was no conflict of interest. Back


    References
 Top
 Notes
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Muhiudeen R.I., Miller-Hance W.C., Silverman N.H. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography for pediatric patients with congenital heart disease. Anesth Analg (1998) 87:1058–1076.[Free Full Text]
  2. Ayres N.A., Miller-Hance W.C., Fyfe D.A., Stevenson J.G., Sahn D.J., Young L.C., et al. Indications and guidelines for performance of transesophageal echocardiography in the patient with acquired or congenital heart disease: a report from the Task Force of the Pediatric Council of the American Society of Echocardiogrophy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr (2005) 18:91–98.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Stevenson J.G. Incidence of complications in pediatric transesophageal echocardiography: experience in 1650 cases. J Am Soc Echocardiogr (1999) 12:527–532.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Bruce C.J., O'Leary P., Hagler D.J., Seward J.B., Cabalka A.K. Miniaturized transesophageal echocardiography in newborn infants. J Am Soc Echocardiogr (2002) 15:791–797.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  5. Andropoulus D.B., Stayer S.A., Bent S.T., Campos C.J., Fraser C.D. The effects of transesophageal echocardiography on hemodynamic variables in small infants undergoing cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth (2000) 14(2):133–135.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  6. Yumoto M., Katsuya H. Transesophageal echocardiography for cardiac surgery in children. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth (2002) 16(5):587–591.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Sloth E., Hasenkam J.M., Sorensen K.E., Pendersen J., Olsen K.H., Hansen O.K., et al. Pediatric multiplane transesophageal echocardiography in congenital heart disease: new possibilities with a miniturized probe. J Am Soc Echocardiogr (1996) 9(5):622–628.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Shiota T., Lewandowski R., Piel J.E., Smit L.S., Lancée C., Djoa K.B., et al. Micromultiplane transesophageal echocardiographic probe for intraoperative study of congenital heart disease in neonates, infants, children, and adults. Am J Card (1999) 83:292–295.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Tardif J.C., Schwartz S.L., Vannan M.A., Cao Q.L., Pandian N.G. Clinical usefulness of multiplane transesophageal echocardiography: comparison to biplanar imaging. Am Heart J (1994) 128(1):156–166.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  10. Yvorchuk K.Y., Sochowski R.A., Chan K.L. A prospective comparison of the multiplane probe with the biplane probe in structure visualization and Doppler examination during transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr (1995) 8(2):111–120.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Ungerleider R.M., Greeley W.J., Skeikh K.H., Philips J., Pearce F.B., Kem F.H., et al. Routine use of intraoperative epicardial echocardiography and Doppler color-flow imaging to guide and evaluate repair of congenital heart lesions: a prospective study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg (1990) 100:297–309.[Abstract]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scohy, T. V.
Right arrow Articles by Bogers, Ad.J.J.C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scohy, T. V.
Right arrow Articles by Bogers, Ad.J.J.C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?