Skip Navigation

European Journal of Echocardiography 2005 6(4):291-293; doi:10.1016/j.euje.2004.10.009
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tallarico, D.
Right arrow Articles by Mazzesi, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tallarico, D.
Right arrow Articles by Mazzesi, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2004, The European Society of Cardiology

Mitral paraprosthetic leak diagnosed by transesophageal echocardiography through nasal way

Demetrio Tallaricoa,*, Pier Andrea Chiavaria, Pasquale Molloa, Fabio Miraldib and Giuseppe Mazzesib

aII Division of Cardiology, Institute of Heart and Great Vessels, Attilio Reale, University of Rome, La Sapienza, Italy
bDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Institute of Heart and Great Vessels, Attilio Reale, University of Rome, La Sapienza, Italy

Received 21 July 2004; received in revised form 12 October 2004; accepted after revision 25 October 2004.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +39 6 4997 0163; fax: +39 6 4997 2410. E-mail: demetrio.tallarico@uniroma1.it


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case report
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
Paraprosthetic leaks are a postoperatively complication recurring with a frequency from 15 to 30%, and mostly in the mitral than in the aortic position. Transthoracic echocardiography can suspect prosthesis valve dysfunction, but for both diagnosis and evaluation of the paraprosthetic dysfunction severity, transesophageal study is required. In this report a mitral paraprosthetic dehiscence was diagnosed using a miniaturized, 10 F, monoplane probe inserted through nasal way. This technique, that do not require topical and general anesthesia, appears to be well tolerated providing an accurate and more comfortable examination.

Keywords: AcuNav; Monoplane probe; Paraprosthetic leak; Transesophageal echocardiography; Transnasal


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case report
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
Paraprosthetic leaks are the major complication of prosthetic valves,1 remaining a substantial source of morbidity and mortality. Their prevalence is about 15%, with higher frequency in mitral (31%) than in aortic position (14%),2–4 and the average time of presentation is nine months after surgery.4 They can be due to a suture's rupture or to an endocarditis infection. Although transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the method of choice for the non-invasive assessment of prosthetic valves, for diagnosis of paraprosthetic jet transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is required.5–9 We report a mitral bioprosthesis dehiscence diagnosed by a TEE through nasal way (TEENW).


    Case report
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case report
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
A 73-year-old man, with a porcine mitral valve implanted three months before, referred for congestive heart failure. On presentation, heart rate was 64 b/m, arterial blood pressure 120/70 mmHg and a severe dyspnea as well as a massive pansystolic murmur were present. ECG showed atrial fibrillation and a strain pattern. TTE demonstrated bi-atrial and left ventricular dilatation with a normal systolic function. Also, it suspected a paraprosthetic leak. Clinical condition prompted us to avoid standard TEE and to perform a TEENW, using a miniaturized, 10F, multifrequency (5.5–10 MHz), monoplane probe (AcuNav, Acuson/Siemens),10 developed for intracardiac ultrasounds. With the patient supine, without topical and general anesthesia, the transducer has been inserted, with a lubricant jelly, through a nostril. Two-dimensional image of TEENW, corresponding to a 60–90° view of a standard TEE, demonstrated a normal bioprosthetic valve, and a large area of posteromedial dehiscence (Fig. 1). Color-flow imaging showed a severe eccentric paraprosthetic jet deforming the atrial septum (Fig. 2). Pulsed-Doppler interrogation of the left upper pulmonary vein revealed a prominent systolic backflow confirming the severe paraprosthetic regurgitation (Fig. 3). No variation of both blood pressure and O2-saturation were registered. Also, no complication occurred during and after the procedure. Patient underwent to a re-surgery, but he died for disseminated intravascular coagulation.


Figure 1
View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1 Two-dimensional image of transesophageal echocardiography through nasal way, corresponding to 60–90° of a standard transesophageal examination, showing the porcine mitral prosthesis with a large area of posteromedial dehiscence (red arrow). (LA=left atrial; LV=left ventricle).

 


Figure 2
View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2 Color-flow imaging showing a severe paraprosthetic regurgitant jet.

 


Figure 3
View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3 Pulsed-Doppler interrogation of the left upper pulmonary vein demonstrating a prominent systolic backflow.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case report
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
Bioprosthesis or mechanical valve dysfunction is a postoperatively complication that recurs with a prevalence of 15–30%. Besides, mitral paraprosthetic leaks are more frequent than these in the aortic position,4 and haemodinamically significant jets are treated by re-surgery.4 Although TTE can suspect a paraprosthetic dehiscence, TEE is generally required for diagnosis. In a recent study the AcuNav probe, was used for transesophageal examination with a good results.11 Moreover, previous reports, using a transesophageal prototype probe, demonstrated the nose to be a good alternative approach for TEE.12,13 We used the AcuNav catheter and the nasal approach to evaluate this clinical question. The nasal way, that avoids attempt at vomiting and choking sensation, provided a comfortable and short examination. Also, it did not require topical and general anesthesia, removing possible complications as hypotension, mental changes, and allergic reactions.


    Conclusion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case report
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 
This report suggests the feasibility of the emerging nasal approach, using the AcuNav transducer, to reach the esophagus. Moreover, this technique showed a good accuracy in this clinical investigation.

TEENW might offer a feasible and equivalent echocardiographic alternative to standard TEE, especially in elderly patients, for target investigations.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Case report
 Discussion
 Conclusion
 References
 

  1. Kloster F.E. Diagnosis and management of complications of prosthetic heart valves. Am J Cardiol (1975 Jun) 35(6):872–885. Review.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  2. Skudicky D., Skoularigis J., Essop M.R., Rothlisberger C., Sareli P. Prevalence and clinical significance of mild paraprosthetic ring leaks and left atrial spontaneous echo contrast detected on transesophageal echocardiography three months after isolated mitral valve replacement with a mechanical prosthesis. Am J Cardiol (1993 Oct) 72(11):848–850.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  3. Bonnefoy E., Perinetti M., Girard C., Robin J., Ninet J., Barthelet N., et al. Systematic transesophageal echocardiography during the postoperative first 24 hours after mitral valve replacement. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss (1995 Mar) 88:315–319.[Web of Science][Medline]
  4. Ionescu A., Fraser A.G., Butchart E.G. Prevalence and clinical significance of incidental paraprosthetic valvar regurgitation: a prospective study using transesophageal echocardiography. Heart (2003 Nov) 89(11):1316–1321.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Daniel L.B., Grigg L.E., Weisel R.D., Rakowski H. Comparison of transthoracic and transesophageal assessment of prosthetic valve dysfunction. Echocardiography (1990 Mar) 7(2):83–95.[Medline]
  6. Chaudhry F.A., Herrera C., DeFrino P.F., Mehlman D.J., Zabalgoitia M. Pathologic and angiographic correlations of transesophageal echocardiography in prosthetic heart valve dysfunction. Am Heart J (1991 Oct) 122(4 Pt 1):1057–1064.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  7. Zabalgoitia M., Herrera C.J., Chaudhry F.A., Calhoon J.H., Mehlman D.J., O'Rourke R.A. Improvement in the diagnosis of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction by transesophageal echocardiography. J Heart Valve Dis (1993 Sep) 2(5):595–603.[Medline]
  8. Castillo J.A., Vilacosta I., Almeria C., San Roman J.A., Zamorano J.L., Rollan M.J., et al. The evaluation of the mechanism of mitral bioprosthesis malfunction by transesophageal echocardiography. Rev Esp Cardiol (1994 Jul) 47(7):454–460.[Medline]
  9. Bach D.S. Transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) evaluation of prosthetic valves. Cardiol Clin (2000 Nov) 18(4):751–771.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Dairywala I.T., Li P., Liu Z., Bowie D., Stewart S.R., Bayoumy A.A., et al. Catheter-based interventions guided solely by a new phased-array intracardiac imaging catheter: in vivo experimental studies. J Am Soc Echocardiogr (2002 Feb) 15(2):150–158.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  11. Orsini A.N., Kolias T.J., Strelich K.R., Armstrong W.F. Feasibility of transesophageal echocardiography with a ten-French monoplane probe. J Am Soc Echocardiography (2003 Jun) 16(6):682–687.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  12. Spencer K.T., Thurn J., Bednarz J., Linder G.S., Connor B., Lang R.M. Transnasal transesophageal stress echocardiography. Echocardiography (1998 Jul) 15(5):467–472.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  13. Zimmermann P., Greim C., Trautner H., Sagmeister U., Kraemer K., Roewer N. Echocardiographic monitoring during induction of general anesthesia with a miniaturized esophageal probe. Anesth Analg (2003 Jan) 96(1):21–27.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tallarico, D.
Right arrow Articles by Mazzesi, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tallarico, D.
Right arrow Articles by Mazzesi, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?