Skip Navigation

European Journal of Echocardiography 2004 5(6):455-468; doi:10.1016/j.euje.2004.04.007
© 2004 by European Society of Cardiology
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kühl, H.P.
Right arrow Articles by Hanrath, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kühl, H.P.
Right arrow Articles by Hanrath, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2004, The European Society of Cardiology

The impact of transesophageal echocardiography on daily clinical practice

H.P. Kühl* and P. Hanrath

Medical Clinic I, University Hospital, Aachen, Germany

Received 10 February 2004; .

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +49-241-8088722; fax: +49-241-8082303. hkuehl{at}ukaachen.de


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Current indications for TEE
 Cardiac sources of embolism
 Infective endocarditis
 Prosthetic heart valves
 Aortic dissection
 Peri-operative application
 Guiding of catheter based...
 Summary
 References
 
The development of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) almost 20 years ago has tremendously widened the diagnostic potential of cardiac ultrasound and has, without doubt, strongly improved our pathophysiological understanding of many cardiovascular diseases such as aortic dissection, mitral valve disease or ischemic stroke. Especially the introduction of multiplane transducers that allow imaging of the cardiac structures from various scan plane orientations has yielded a level of diagnostic accuracy that is seldom attained by other imaging modalities. The outstanding image quality as well as the high temporal and spatial resolution provided by TEE renders the method especially suited to visualize small and rapidly moving structures, such as left atrial thrombus formation and valvular vegetations. In addition, TEE is exceptional in its capability to scan the heart from perspectives that cannot be easily attained by any other modality, thus enhancing its diagnostic yield. In the last few years the clinical application of TEE has been extended from a pure diagnostic tool to an indispensable monitoring adjunct for percutaneous interventional procedures as well as for the intra- and peri-operative monitoring in the operating theatre and on the intensive care unit.

In the surroundings of emerging sophisticated technologies to image the heart and the great vessels within the thorax such as multi-slice computed tomography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging TEE asserts a firm place in the diagnostic armamentarium for the cardiologist. This review will focus the impact of TEE in daily clinical practice and on possible future applications of the technique.

Keywords: Transesophageal echocardiography; Source of embolism; Infective endocarditis; Aortic dissection; Prosthetic heart valve; Left ventricular function


    Current indications for TEE
 Top
 Abstract
 Current indications for TEE
 Cardiac sources of embolism
 Infective endocarditis
 Prosthetic heart valves
 Aortic dissection
 Peri-operative application
 Guiding of catheter based...
 Summary
 References
 
The indications for a TEE study have widened continuously in the recent years. To date TEE is indicated in almost any condition in which transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) fails to provide conclusive diagnostic information or where TTE is not possible (i.e. during surgery). Moreover, TEE is indicated whenever it is expected to add important information beyond that obtained by TTE and whenever the clinical question is important enough to warrant the small risk and discomfort associated with the procedure. Fig. 1 demonstrates the distribution of the main indications for a TEE study as performed in 862 patients at the University Hospital, Aachen, Germany. The principal indications for a TEE study published in the Guidelines from the Working Group on Echocardiography of the ESC are summarized in Table 1.1


Figure 1
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1 Frequency distribution of the indications for a TEE study assessed in the cardiology department of the University Hospital Aachen, Germany. Searching for cardiac sources of emboli was by far the most common indication for a TEE study.

 


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Principal TEE indications (according to Ref.1)

 

    Cardiac sources of embolism
 Top
 Abstract
 Current indications for TEE
 Cardiac sources of embolism
 Infective endocarditis
 Prosthetic heart valves
 Aortic dissection
 Peri-operative application
 Guiding of catheter based...
 Summary
 References
 
Stroke is among the leading causes of death in the Western world. Almost 80–85% of all strokes are of ischemic origin and up to 20% of cerebral ischemic events are presumed to have a cardio-embolic origin.2 TEE is highly sensitive in depicting possible sources of cardiac embolism with a diagnostic yield that may exceed 50%.3 The high diagnostic sensitivity in determining the sources of embolism is based on the proximity of the esophagus and the heart allowing for a high-resolution, detailed visualization of the posterior cardiac structures including the atria, left atrial appendage, interatrial septum with accurate delineation of its anomalies, and left-sided heart valves as well as atherosclerotic lesions within the thoracic aorta. The search for cardiac sources of embolism is currently the leading indication for a TEE study in many centers.

TEE has considerably improved our pathophysiological understanding and diagnostic potential of cardiovascular related embolic events. Potential sources of embolism include intracardiac and aortic masses such as thrombi, tumors or vegetations as well as abnormalities associated with the atrial septum, which may act as a conduit for thrombi of the venous system, such as patent foramen ovale—isolated or in combination with an atrial septal aneurysm—and atrial septal defects (Fig. 2). In addition, there are other conditions, which may be associated with an enhanced potential for thrombus formation such as spontaneous echo contrast within the left atrium, which is accurately identified by TEE.


Figure 2
View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2 Rare finding of a large straddling thrombus (only partially visualized) in a patent foramen ovale in a patent with severe acute pulmonary embolism. IAS = interatrial septum; LA = left atrium; RA = right atrium; AoA = ascending aorta.

 
Atrial fibrillation is associated with a two-fold increase in cardiovascular mortality and a five- to six-fold increased risk for cardio-embolic stroke.4 The loss of mechanical atrial function results in an altered hemodynamic state with stasis of blood flow which favors the formation of thrombi, especially in the left atrial appendage (Fig. 3). Several clinical conditions such as advanced age, presence of mitral stenosis, hypertension or an impaired left ventricular function substantially increase the risk for atrial thrombus formation in the presence of intermittent or permanent atrial fibrillation.4 Embolization of left atrial thrombi in atrial fibrillation account for >45% of cardiogenic thromboemboli. Among patients presenting with new-onset atrial fibrillation TEE studies have demonstrated an incidence of atrial thrombi in 12–15% of patients5,6 and an incidence of 27% in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation.7 The frequency approaches 50% among patients presenting with atrial fibrillation in the setting of acute clinical thromboembolism.8 Due to the proximity of the echoscope to the left atrium and atrial appendage TEE is the method of choice for the detection of atrial thrombi in patients with atrial fibrillation. In addition, the combination of TEE and pulsed wave Doppler has further augmented our understanding of the thromboembolic risk of patients with atrial fibrillation.9 Characteristic findings identified by TEE indicating a low-flow state in the left atrium include an enlarged atrium, spontaneous echo contrast and a reduced flow rate (<25 cm/s) within the enlarged left atrial appendage (Fig. 3). Low-flow conditions are associated with an increased thromboembolic risk even in the absence of a left atrial thrombus and are also associated with a high recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation after successful cardioversion. Despite restoration of sinus rhythm the increased thromboembolic risk persists early after cardioversion which is believed to be caused by "atrial stunning".10 TEE has proven useful to guide cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation. In the ACUTE trial patients were randomized to a conventional treatment strategy consisting of a prolonged anticoagulation treatment period without TEE prior to cardioversion and to a TEE-guided strategy with a short-term anticoagulation treatment preconversion.11 Although there were no differences in the rate of embolic events after cardioversion between the two treatment groups, bleeding complications were significantly lower in the TEE-guided group.11 In combination with low-molecular weight heparin TEE-guided cardioversion may be considered a safe and clinically effective alternative to the conventional treatment strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation, as has been recently demonstrated in the ACE-trial.12


Figure 3
View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3 Echocardiographic findings demonstrating a low-flow state in the left atrial appendage in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. Left panel: swirling and smoke-like spontaneous echo contrast (SEC, notched arrowheads) as well as a thrombus can be detected in the left atrial appendage. Right panels: pulsed wave Doppler curves demonstrating normal atrial appendage flow velocities (>25 cm/s) in patients with normal sinus rhythm (upper panel) and decreased flow velocities (<25 cm/s) in a patient with chronic atrial fibrillation (lower panel).

 
Atherosclerotic lesions of the aorta detected by TEE have been recognized as an important cause of stroke and peripheral embolic disease which may lead to severe neurological deficits as well as multi-organ failure and death.13,14 Using TEE the prevalence of thoracic aortic atheromas is 27% in patients who have experienced a previous embolic event.15 When atheromas are present the incidence of stroke is 12% in one year and as many as one-third of patients with significant aortic plaques may experience either a stroke or a peripheral embolism in the same time period.15 Plaque thickness and plaque composition as assessed by TEE have been identified as major risk factors for embolic complications (Fig. 4). A strong association has been demonstrated between protruding, non-calcified plaques ≥4 mm in the aorta detected by TEE and the risk of ischemic stroke and peripheral embolism.14,16 Moreover, as many as 25–50% of protruding plaques may demonstrate superimposed mobile thrombi ranging from one to several centimeters, which impart a high embolic risk.15 Atheromas in the aortic arch and ascending or descending aorta identified by TEE may be the cause of many otherwise unexplained strokes (so-called "cryptogenic strokes").


Figure 4
View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 4 Severe plaques of the aorta descendents (AoD). The complete circumference of the aorta is severely diseased by the atherosclerotic process with multiple plaques protruding into the lumen of the aorta.

 
Aortic atheromas are also an important cause of stroke during open heart surgery.17 The increased number of elderly patients with severe atheromatous disease of the aorta has focused clinical interest on the management of severe atheroma of the ascending aorta and the associated risk of intraoperative embolization. Simple palpation of the aorta during surgery underestimates the degree of disease.18 In contrast, intraoperative TEE provides unique information on the localization and composition of aortic atheroma which may alter the conduct of the operation, especially with regard to the site of cross clamping of the aorta. If atheromas are detected in the arch or in the ascending aorta the intraoperative stroke rate is significantly increased compared to patients without atheroma.17 Moreover, the in-hospital mortality rates of patients with intraoperative stroke approaches 40% and survivors often remain severely disabled.19 In addition, the in-hospital mortality rate for patients with aortic arch atheromas detected by TEE is almost 15%.19 Thus, patients with atheromas of the aorta detected by TEE represent a high-risk group for cardiac surgery. This prognostically useful information provided by TEE must be considered in the risk-benefit analysis for patients who undergo elective cardiac surgery.

In younger patients <50 years with an otherwise unexplained ischemic embolic event an increased prevalence of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) as a potential mechanism for a paradoxical embolism has been reported.20,21 TEE is considered the imaging modality of choice for the identification of a PFO. Detection of a PFO is best accomplished using peripheral venous injections of contrast material (i.e. agitated saline or polyoxygelatine) in combination with a strenuous Valsalva maneuver allowing for the direct visualization and quantitation of the atrial right to left shunt (Fig. 5). Moreover, TEE may identify additional risk factors such as a large shunt (either spontaneously or after provocation), a larger PFO size ≥4 mm, or an atrial septal aneurysm (ASA, Fig. 5). Several studies have shown that these abnormalities are linked to an increased likelihood for paradoxical embolic events as well as to an increased risk for recurrent ischemic events.22–24 TEE may also be helpful in selecting the appropriate treatment strategy for patients with presumed paradoxical embolic events: patients with a small PFO and no ASA are at low risk for recurrent embolic events and may be safely treated with antithrombotic therapy alone, while patients with a larger PFO in combination with ASA are at high risk for recurrence and may need more aggressive treatment such as anticoagulation or interventional closure of the PFO.24 Thus, TEE is very helpful in identifying patients with a potential paradoxical embolic event, to stratify these patients according to their risk for recurrent events and to guide therapy. Moreover, TEE allows for accurate delineation of the anatomy of the interatrial septum and its neighboring structures, which is important for the planning of interventional percutaneous PFO closure.


Figure 5
View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 5 Morphological alterations of the interatrial septum (IAS). Left panel: a patent foramen ovale (PFO) is detected after injection of echocardiographic contrast material into an antecubital vein. The right atrium (RA) is completely filled with contrast material. The appearance of a cloud of contrast bubbles (thick white arrow) in the left atrium (LA) through the IAS can be clearly appreciated. Right panel: bulging of the IAS towards the LA is shown corresponding to an atrial septum aneurysm (ASA). AoA = ascending aorta.

 

    Infective endocarditis
 Top
 Abstract
 Current indications for TEE
 Cardiac sources of embolism
 Infective endocarditis
 Prosthetic heart valves
 Aortic dissection
 Peri-operative application
 Guiding of catheter based...
 Summary
 References
 
Infective endocarditis is a life-threatening disease with significant morbidity and mortality rates as high as 20–25%.25 There is still a continuous rise in the incidence of infective endocarditis despite significant improvements in diagnosis and treatment which is mainly caused by increasing numbers of intravenous drug abusers, patients with prosthetic heart valves and elderly patients. Improvement of patient outcome requires accurate diagnosis, early recognition of complications and timely initiation of treatment. Echocardiography has dramatically improved the evaluation of infective endocarditis and is now considered as an indispensable tool in the diagnosis and management of suspected or established endocarditis. Especially the development of TEE has greatly improved the detection of small vegetations,26 prosthetic valve endocarditis,27 paravalvular abscess28 as well as recognition of artifacts and normal cardiac structures that may be mistaken for endocarditis. The immense diagnostic potential of echocardiography and especially TEE in the setting of infective endocarditis has led to a revision of the diagnostic criteria to include echocardiographic findings as a major diagnostic criterion.29

Compared to transthoracic echocardiography TEE has considerably facilitated the process of making the correct diagnosis in the context of suspected endocarditis because TEE provides a significant improvement in sensitivity, primarily at detecting small vegetations (<5 mm) which are difficult to visualize by TTE.26 Moreover, TEE is superior to TTE in the visualization of complications of endocarditis such as paravalvular abscess (Fig. 6), fistulas and perforations, prosthetic valve dehiscence and paravalvular regurgitation.27 The improvement in imaging with TEE is most striking in the detection of prosthetic valve endocarditis (Fig. 7), especially of the mitral valve, due to enhanced visualization of the left atrial side of the prosthetic valve.28


Figure 6
View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 6 Long-axis views of the aortic valve demonstrating a severe aortic valve endocarditis with abscess formation in an intravenous drug abuser. Left panel: a large vegetation (thin arrow) is detected on the right coronary and non-coronary cusp of the aortic valve. A cavity has formed adjacent to the right coronary cusp corresponding to a large abscess (white thick arrows). Right panel: the inflammatory process has resulted in destruction of the right coronary cusp with loss of coaptation between the valve cusps (broken thin arrow) resulting in severe aortic insufficiency. LVOT = left ventricular outflow tract; LA = left atrium; AoA = ascending aorta.

 


Figure 7
View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 7 Endocarditis of a bileaflet aortic valve mechanical prosthesis. Left panel: long-axis view demonstrating a vegetation on the aortic side of the valve prosthesis. Right panel: on the short-axis view it is apparent that vegetations are present on both prosthetic leaflets of the mechanical aortic valve. AoA = ascending aorta; AV = aortic valve; LA = left atrium.

 
Based on these facts—in the setting of suspected endocarditis—and according to the guidelines of the American Heart Association, TEE is the primary imaging modality of choice, especially in patients with artificial valves, in patients with intermediate or high clinical suspicion of infective endocarditis and in patients with high risk of infective endocarditis related complications such as Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.30


    Prosthetic heart valves
 Top
 Abstract
 Current indications for TEE
 Cardiac sources of embolism
 Infective endocarditis
 Prosthetic heart valves
 Aortic dissection
 Peri-operative application
 Guiding of catheter based...
 Summary
 References
 
Prosthetic valve abnormalities, dysfunction or other associated pathologies are being recognized in an increasing number of patients as the rate of valve replacement surgery grows.

TEE has gained increasing acceptance as a valuable method to assess prosthetic valve function. Compared to transthoracic echocardiography TEE provides improved signal-to-noise ratio and improved spatial resolution using high frequency transducers. Moreover, improved acoustic penetration through mechanical valves has made TEE the first choice modality for the investigation of patients with prosthetic valves, especially in those with mechanical mitral valve replacement (Fig. 8). Additional pathomorphological findings such as thrombi in the left atrium and left atrial appendage as well as valvular or paravalvular leakages can be easily detected by TEE. These findings are nearly always missed by TTE, especially in mechanical prostheses, because of shadowing. However, for patients with both aortic and mitral valve mechanical prostheses a combination of TTE and TEE imaging might be indicated for complete evaluation of valve function and morphology of both valves. In patients with biological valve prostheses, TEE can readily identify degenerative valve alterations such as thickening or calcification of the leaflets, leaflet tears or prolapse.


Figure 8
View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 8 Thrombus formation on the left atrial aspect of a mechanical prosthetic valve in the mitral position.

 
Prosthetic valve thrombosis is an infrequent but potentially life-threatening complication with a reported incidence of 0.5–8% of left-sided and up to 20% of tricuspid valves.31–33 Thrombolytic therapy is a therapeutical alternative to re-operation which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality.34 However, thrombolysis is associated with an unpredictable risk of embolization of thrombus material and bleeding.35 A recent study has demonstrated that thrombus size, as imaged by TEE, is an independent predictor of outcome of patients with prosthetic valve thrombosis.36 In that study the rate of death and complications were low in patients with a thrombus size <0.8 cm2 irrespective of functional class while it was increased in those with a thrombus size ≥0.8 cm2.36 Thus, TEE can identify low-risk groups suited for thrombolysis and it is therefore recommended in the management of prosthetic valve thrombosis.


    Aortic dissection
 Top
 Abstract
 Current indications for TEE
 Cardiac sources of embolism
 Infective endocarditis
 Prosthetic heart valves
 Aortic dissection
 Peri-operative application
 Guiding of catheter based...
 Summary
 References
 
The incidence of aortic dissection is approximately 5–30 per one million people per year.37 Symptom onset is often sudden and may mimic acute myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism and cardiogenic shock. Thus, a high level of suspicion is necessary for establishing the correct diagnosis and for choosing the optimal treatment. Complications often occur randomly and the outcome is frequently fatal. Twenty-one percent of patients with aortic dissection die before hospital admission.38 The mortality rate for patients with untreated proximal aortic dissection has been reported to increase by 1–3% per hour and is approximately 25% during the first 24 h after initial presentation; 70% of patients with untreated proximal aortic dissection die within the first week and less of 10% of these patients live for 1 year.39,40

The most common mechanism for aortic dissection is believed to be associated with rupture of the intima followed by cleavage formation and propagation of the dissection into the media.41 However, TEE has enhanced and extended our present understanding of the pathogenesis of aortic dissection. Based on TEE observations intramural hematoma as well as penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers are now believed to be major precursors of aortic wall dissection.42 These conditions may lead to perforation of the intima and initiate dissection. A recent study using TEE has shown that intramural hematoma is associated with a poor outcome, especially when the ascending aortic is affected and when the disease has resulted in a dilatation of the ascending aorta ≥50 mm.43

Although CT, MRI and TEE have a similar diagnostic yield for the detection of aortic dissection with high sensitivities and specificities,44 the latter technique offers unique advantages that render the method the diagnostic modality of choice for the identification of aortic dissection. As a bed-side technology TEE allows immediate examination of hemodynamically compromised, unstable patients on the intensive care unit. Patients with acute proximal aortic dissection who are candidates for surgery can be directly carried to the operating theatre, thus saving valuable time and increasing the safety for the patient. In combination with Color-Doppler flow TEE possesses the ability to identify the exact pathomorphology of the dissection including the entry and re-entry sites of dissection (Fig. 9) and thrombosis of the false lumen, as well as associated complications such as involvement of the coronary arteries and arch, the presence, extent and hemodynamic significance of pericardial effusion and the presence and severity of aortic regurgitation. The most important diagnostic finding of aortic dissection that can be seen on TEE is the presence of an undulating intimal flap within the aortic lumen that differentiates a false (usually larger) lumen from a true (usually smaller) lumen (Fig. 10). In addition TEE can be used for follow-up examinations after surgical or medical treatment to detect late complications such as aneurysm formation at the site of operation or to provide useful prognostic information in terms of progression of thrombosis in the false lumen.


Figure 9
View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 9 Dissection of the descending aorta. Color-Doppler image showing blood flow jet from the smaller true lumen (TL) towards the larger false lumen (FL) corresponding to the entry site of the dissection.

 


Figure 10
View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 10 Acute aortic dissection. Upper panel: long-axis view of the ascending aorta showing a dissection membrane arising shortly above the aortic valve. Lower panels: short-axis views of the ascending (left) and descending (right) aorta demonstrating the typical finding of an undulating intimal flap within the aortic lumen that differentiates a false (usually larger) lumen from a true (usually smaller) lumen.

 

    Peri-operative application
 Top
 Abstract
 Current indications for TEE
 Cardiac sources of embolism
 Infective endocarditis
 Prosthetic heart valves
 Aortic dissection
 Peri-operative application
 Guiding of catheter based...
 Summary
 References
 
Intra-operative applications of TEE enable continuous monitoring of the surgical procedure without disturbing the sterile field, in contrast to epicardial echocardiography. During myocardial revascularization TEE allows for the non-invasive evaluation of global left ventricular function. In addition, it can accurately identify regional wall motion abnormalities as possible marker of myocardial hypoperfusion before and immediately after bypass.45 In the growing area of "off-pump" bypass surgery TEE is an indispensable tool for monitoring of the success of the surgical procedure.

TEE provides information of greatest value in reconstructive mitral valve surgery. The pathomorphology of the diseased valve and subvalvular apparatus can be clearly defined by TEE which may have important impact on the feasibility and surgical strategy during operation.46 This is of relevance in surgical correction of mitral regurgitation because valve repair has been shown to be more beneficial than valve replacement and to improve long-term survival.47 Decisions based on TEE made at the time of operation may effect on both early and late survival and the need for re-operation or replacement of the valve during the operation.46

High-risk patients with poor ventricular function undergoing coronary bypass surgery often receive hemodynamic support in the peri-operative period by implantation of an intra-aortic balloon pump. TEE is very helpful in guiding correct positioning of the balloon tip in the descending aorta during insertion. Moreover, it allows for the detection of severe atheroma, which may prohibit implantation to avoid potential embolic complications. In the early postoperative period TTE is often unsatisfactory after open chest surgery for various reasons including the presence of air and tubes in the operative field. Therefore, TEE is the best imaging modality for imaging of the heart postoperatively. It is especially useful for the evaluation of global and regional function, assessment of the filling status of the left ventricle and detection of pericardial effusion or hematoma within the pericardial space after operation.

In the intensive care unit TEE is of great clinical importance to image the heart in intubated and ventilated patients where TTE is often not successful. In patients presenting with hypotension and low cardiac output TEE monitoring of the left ventricle allows immediate discrimination between hypovolemia, depressed myocardial functional or hyperdynamic failure as the underlying mechanism as well as the exclusion of cardiac tamponade. Moreover, TEE provides valuable additional information on the etiology of cardiac decompensation allowing for detecting valvular heart disease, abnormal regional function and abnormal diastolic function. Thus, immediate availability of the hemodynamic and anatomic information gained from TEE may permit rapid and adequate therapeutic intervention.48 With the introduction of a miniaturized monoplane TEE probe, which allows nasal insertion, continuous monitoring of during operation and in the postoperative period seems feasible. In summary, TEE is now considered an indispensable tool in the perioperative management of patients undergoing major cardiac surgery as well as in the management of patients with heart disease in the intensive care unit.


    Guiding of catheter based interventions
 Top
 Abstract
 Current indications for TEE
 Cardiac sources of embolism
 Infective endocarditis
 Prosthetic heart valves
 Aortic dissection
 Peri-operative application
 Guiding of catheter based...
 Summary
 References
 
Catheter based interventions for the treatment of congenital heart disease or acquired disease of the aorta in pediatric and adult patients represent an arena in which the use of TEE guidance is of great importance. The combined use of X-ray and TEE imaging is in many cases mandatory for the success of the interventional procedure. It provides instantaneous recognition of the morphological and hemodynamic result and its complications. Specific applications include transseptal puncture, catheter positioning during radiofrequency ablation, balloon atrial septostomy, balloon positioning during pulmonary/aortic or mitral valvuloplasty and transcatheter closure of atrial and ventricular septal defects as well as of PFO. Moreover, stenting of the aorta in selected patients with aortic dissection becomes an important treatment option to improve prognosis in patients who are no candidates for surgery.49 Aortic stent-graft placement allows for occlusion of the intimal entry tear by implantation of a membrane-covered self-expanding stent-graft to initiate progressive thrombus formation within the false lumen and thereby avoid complications such as aortic dilatation, aneurysm formation as well as rupture.

Results obtained by TEE are important in patients with a PFO and a paradoxical embolic event to assess the exact morphology of the atrial septum and to evaluate the suitability for percutaneous closure of the PFO. Although the procedure might be successfully performed without TEE guidance, the direct visualization of the anatomy of the atrial septum and of the spatial relation between the device and the septum during implantation may increase the success rate as well as the safety of the procedure. In the setting of an atrial septal defect a pre-interventional TEE examination is a prerequisite to define the exact morphology and site of the atrial septal defect as well as its relation to neighboring structures such as the mitral and tricuspid annulus, coronary sinus and pulmonary veins. TEE is an indispensable tool during percutaneous closure of an atrial septal defect to guide correct positioning of the device, to recognize malpositioning and to assess potential or imminent complications (Fig. 11).50 In the post-interventional control TEE is necessary to detect complications such as thrombus formation (Fig. 12) on the device, residual shunting, strut fractures or dislocation of the device.51


Figure 11
View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 11 Large atrial septal defect (white thick arrow pointing to the defect of the interatrial septum) before (left panel) and after interventional closure (right panel) with the occluder device located in the correct position. LA = left atrium; RA = right atrium; VCS = vena cava superior.

 


Figure 12
View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 12 Complication of an interventional PFO closure with a large thrombus detected on the left atrial (LA) aspect of the occluder device. RA = right atrium; AV = aortic valve.

 
A promising new field for TEE may be TEE-guided cardioversion via the same probe using a condome-like sheath with incorporated electrodes.52,53 This would allow for exclusion of atrial thrombi and electrical cardioversion via the esophagus within the same session. Data in experimental animals have demonstrated a 4-fold reduction in the cardioversion threshold during esophageal cardioversion compared to the external approach.52 This technique would not only contribute to save time and costs but also to reduce discomfort for the patients who can be safely treated in only one session needing only one sedation.


    Summary
 Top
 Abstract
 Current indications for TEE
 Cardiac sources of embolism
 Infective endocarditis
 Prosthetic heart valves
 Aortic dissection
 Peri-operative application
 Guiding of catheter based...
 Summary
 References
 
TEE has opened a new window to the heart. Its success rate is impressive. In less than two decades it has become an integral part of pediatric and adult cardiology as well as cardiac surgery and anesthesiology. The range of indications has broadened since its introduction almost 20 years ago. Technical improvements in transducer technology and the development of miniaturized matrix transducers might in the near future allow for a real-time three-dimensional view onto the heart even from the esophagus. It is anticipated that this will further increase the diagnostic potential of the technique and its importance for guiding of therapeutical procedures. The combination of unique morphological and hemodynamic information of exceptional diagnostic quality and the possibility to use this diagnostic method as a bed-side tool in the intensive care unit and the operating theatre guarantee that this diagnostic modality will maintain its firm place in the diagnostic armamentarium of cardiologists and anesthesiologists, beside novel and emerging imaging modalities such as cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and multi-slice computed tomography.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Current indications for TEE
 Cardiac sources of embolism
 Infective endocarditis
 Prosthetic heart valves
 Aortic dissection
 Peri-operative application
 Guiding of catheter based...
 Summary
 References
 

  1. Flachskampf F.A., Decoodt P., Fraser A.G., Daniel W.G., Roelandt J.R. Guidelines from the Working Group. Recommendations for performing transesophageal echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr (2001) 2:8–21.[Free Full Text]
  2. Cardiogenic brain embolism. The second report of the Cerebral Embolism Task Force. Arch Neurol (1989) 46:727–743.[Abstract]
  3. DeRook F.A., Comess K.A., Albers G.W., Popp R.L. Transesophageal echocardiography in the evaluation of stroke. Ann Intern Med (1992) 117:922–932.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  4. Hart R.G., Halperin J.L. Atrial fibrillation and thromboembolism: a decade of progress in stroke prevention. Ann Intern Med (1999) 131:688–695.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Klein A.L., Grimm R.A., Black I.W., Leung D.Y., Chung M.K., Vaughn S.E., et al. Cardioversion guided by transesophageal echocardiography: the ACUTE Pilot Study. A randomized, controlled trial. Assessment of Cardioversion Using Transesophageal Echocardiography. Ann Intern Med (1997) 126:200–209.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Manning W.J., Silverman D.I., Gordon S.P., Krumholz H.M., Douglas P.S. Cardioversion from atrial fibrillation without prolonged anticoagulation with use of transesophageal echocardiography to exclude the presence of atrial thrombi. N Engl J Med (1993) 328:750–755.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Stoddard M.F., Dawkins P.R., Prince C.R., Ammash N.M. Left atrial appendage thrombus is not uncommon in patients with acute atrial fibrillation and a recent embolic event: a transesophageal echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol (1995) 25:452–459.[Abstract]
  8. Manning W.J., Silverman D.I., Waksmonski C.A., Oettgen P., Douglas P.S. Prevalence of residual left atrial thrombi among patients with acute thromboembolism and newly recognized atrial fibrillation. Arch Intern Med (1995) 155:2193–2198.[Abstract]
  9. Manning W.J., Leeman D.E., Gotch P.J., Come P.C. Pulsed Doppler evaluation of atrial mechanical function after electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol (1989) 13:617–623.[Abstract]
  10. Fatkin D., Kuchar D.L., Thorburn C.W., Feneley M.P. Transesophageal echocardiography before and during direct current cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: evidence for "atrial stunning" as a mechanism of thromboembolic complications. J Am Coll Cardiol (1994) 23:307–316.[Abstract]
  11. Klein A.L., Grimm R.A., Murray R.D., Apperson-Hansen C., Asinger R.W., Black I.W., et al. Use of transesophageal echocardiography to guide cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med (2001) 344:1411–1420.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Stellbrink C., Nixdorff U., Hofmann T., Lehmacher W., Daniel W.G., Hanrath P., et al. Safety and efficacy of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin and oral anticoagulants for prevention of thromboembolic complications in cardioversion of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: the Anticoagulation in Cardioversion using Enoxaparin (ACE) trial. Circulation (2004) 109:997–1003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Atherosclerotic disease of the aortic arch as a risk factor for recurrent ischemic stroke. The French Study of Aortic Plaques in Stroke Group. N Engl J Med (1996) 334:1216–1221.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Amarenco P., Cohen A., Tzourio C., Bertrand B., Hommel M., Besson G., et al. Atherosclerotic disease of the aortic arch and the risk of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med (1994) 331:1474–1479.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Tunick P.A., Kronzon I. Atheromas of the thoracic aorta: clinical and therapeutic update. J Am Coll Cardiol (2000) 35:545–554.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Cohen A., Tzourio C., Bertrand B., Chauvel C., Bousser M.G., Amarenco P. Aortic plaque morphology and vascular events: a follow-up study in patients with ischemic stroke. FAPS Investigators. French Study of Aortic Plaques in Stroke. Circulation (1997) 96:3838–3841.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Katz E.S., Tunick P.A., Rusinek H., Ribakove G., Spencer F.C., Kronzon I. Protruding aortic atheromas predict stroke in elderly patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: experience with intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol (1992) 20:70–77.[Abstract]
  18. Marshall W.G. Jr., Barzilai B., Kouchoukos N.T., Saffitz J. Intraoperative ultrasonic imaging of the ascending aorta. Ann Thorac Surg (1989) 48:339–344.[Abstract]
  19. Stern A., Tunick P.A., Culliford A.T., Lachmann J., Baumann F.G., Kanchuger M.S., et al. Protruding aortic arch atheromas: risk of stroke during heart surgery with and without aortic arch endarterectomy. Am Heart J (1999) 138:746–752.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  20. Lechat P., Mas J.L., Lascault G., Loron P., Theard M., Klimczac M., et al. Prevalence of patent foramen ovale in patients with stroke. N Engl J Med (1988) 318:1148–1152.[Abstract]
  21. Di Tullio M., Sacco R.L., Gopal A., Mohr J.P., Homma S. Patent foramen ovale as a risk factor for cryptogenic stroke. Ann Intern Med (1992) 117:461–465.[ISI][Medline]
  22. Steiner M.M., Di Tullio M.R., Rundek T., Gan R., Chen X., Liguori C., et al. Patent foramen ovale size and embolic brain imaging findings among patients with ischemic stroke. Stroke (1998) 29:944–948.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Schuchlenz H.W., Weihs W., Horner S., Quehenberger F. The association between the diameter of a patent foramen ovale and the risk of embolic cerebrovascular events. Am J Med (2000) 109:456–462.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  24. Mas J.L., Arquizan C., Lamy C., et al. Recurrent cerebrovascular events associated with patent foramen ovale, atrial septal aneurysm, or both. N Engl J Med (2001) 345:1740–1746.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Mylonakis E., Calderwood S.B. Infective endocarditis in adults. N Engl J Med (2001) 345:1318–1330.[Free Full Text]
  26. Erbel R., Rohmann S., Drexler M., Mohr-Kahaly S., Gerharz C.D., Iversen S., et al. Improved diagnostic value of echocardiography in patients with infective endocarditis by transoesophageal approach. A prospective study. Eur Heart J (1988) 9:43–53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Daniel W.G., Mugge A., Grote J., Hausmann D., Nikutta P., Laas J., et al. Comparison of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography for detection of abnormalities of prosthetic and bioprosthetic valves in the mitral and aortic positions. Am J Cardiol (1993) 71:210–215.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  28. Daniel W.G., Mugge A., Martin R.P., Lindert O., Hausmann D., Nonnast-Daniel B., et al. Improvement in the diagnosis of abscesses associated with endocarditis by transesophageal echocardiography. N Engl J Med (1991) 324:795–800.[Abstract]
  29. Durack D.T., Lukes A.S., Bright D.K. New criteria for diagnosis of infective endocarditis: utilization of specific echocardiographic findings. Duke Endocarditis Service. Am J Med (1994) 96:200–209.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  30. Cheitlin M.D., Armstrong W.F., Aurigemma G.P., Beller G.A., Bierman F.Z., Davis J.L., et al. ACC/AHA/ASE 2003 guideline update for the clinical application of echocardiography: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASE Committee to Update the 1997 Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography). Circulation (2003) 108:1146–1162.[Free Full Text]
  31. Edmunds L.H. Jr. Thromboembolic complications of current cardiac valvular prostheses. Ann Thorac Surg (1982) 34:96–106.[Abstract]
  32. Kontos G.J. Jr., Schaff H.V., Orszulak T.A., Puga F.J., Pluth J.R., Danielson G.K. Thrombotic obstruction of disc valves: clinical recognition and surgical management. Ann Thorac Surg (1989) 48:60–65.[Abstract]
  33. Thorburn C.W., Morgan J.J., Shanahan M.X., Chang V.P. Long-term results of tricuspid valve replacement and the problem of prosthetic valve thrombosis. Am J Cardiol (1983) 51:1128–1132.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  34. Silber H., Khan S.S., Matloff J.M., Chaux A., DeRobertis M., Gray R. The St. Jude valve. Thrombolysis as the first line of therapy for cardiac valve thrombosis. Circulation (1993) 87:30–37.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Roudaut R., Labbe T., Lorient-Roudaut M.F., Gosse P., Baudet E., Fontan F., et al. Mechanical cardiac valve thrombosis. Is fibrinolysis justified? Circulation (1992) 86:I8–I15.
  36. Tong A.T., Roudaut R., Ozkan M., Sagie A., Shahid M.S., Pontes Junior S.C., et al. Transesophageal echocardiography improves risk assessment of thrombolysis of prosthetic valve thrombosis: results of the international PRO-TEE registry. J Am Coll Cardiol (2004) 43:77–84.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Khan I.A., Nair C.K. Clinical, diagnostic, and management perspectives of aortic dissection. Chest (2002) 122:311–328.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  38. Meszaros I., Morocz J., Szlavi J., Schmidt J., Tornoci L., Nagy L., et al. Epidemiology and clinicopathology of aortic dissection. Chest (2000) 117:1271–1278.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  39. Hirst A.E. Jr., Johns V.J. Jr., Kime S.W. Jr. Dissecting aneurysm of the aorta: a review of 505 cases. Medicine (1958) 37:217–279.[Medline]
  40. Pitt M.P., Bonser R.S. The natural history of thoracic aortic aneurysm disease: an overview. J Card Surg (1997) 12:270–278.[ISI][Medline]
  41. Wilson S.K., Hutchins G.M. Aortic dissecting aneurysms: causative factors in 204 subjects. Arch Pathol Lab Med (1982) 106:175–180.[ISI][Medline]
  42. Coady M.A., Rizzo J.A., Elefteriades J.A. Pathologic variants of thoracic aortic dissections. Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers and intramural hematomas. Cardiol Clin (1999) 17:637–657.[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Evangelista A., Dominguez R., Sebastia C., Salas A., Permanyer-Miralda G., Avegliano G., et al. Prognostic value of clinical and morphologic findings in short-term evolution of aortic intramural haematoma. Therapeutic implications. Eur Heart J (2004) 25:81–87.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Erbel R., Engberding R., Daniel W., Roelandt J., Visser C., Rennollet H. Echocardiography in diagnosis of aortic dissection. Lancet (1989) 1:457–461.[ISI][Medline]
  45. Leung J.M., O'Kelly B., Browner W.S., Tubau J., Hollenberg M., Mangano D.T. Prognostic importance of postbypass regional wall-motion abnormalities in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. SPI Research Group. Anesthesiology (1989) 71:16–25.[ISI][Medline]
  46. Sheikh K.H., de Bruijn N.P., Rankin J.S., Clements F.M., Stanley T., Wolfe W.G., et al. The utility of transesophageal echocardiography and Doppler color flow imaging in patients undergoing cardiac valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol (1990) 15:363–372.[Abstract]
  47. Enriquez-Sarano M., Schaff H.V., Orszulak T.A., Tajik A.J., Bailey K.R., Frye R.L. Valve repair improves the outcome of surgery for mitral regurgitation. A multivariate analysis. Circulation (1995) 91:1022–1028.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Costachescu T., Denault A., Guimond J.G., Couture P., Carignan S., Sheridan P., et al. The hemodynamically unstable patient in the intensive care unit: hemodynamic vs. transesophageal echocardiographic monitoring. Crit Care Med (2002) 30:1214–1223.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  49. Nienaber C.A., Fattori R., Lund G., Dieckmann C., Wolf W., von Kodolitsch Y., et al. Nonsurgical reconstruction of thoracic aortic dissection by stent-graft placement. N Engl J Med (1999) 340:1539–1545.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Mazic U., Gavora P., Masura J. The role of transesophageal echocardiography in transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects by the Amplatzer septal occluder. Am Heart J (2001) 142:482–488.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  51. Krumsdorf U., Ostermayer S., Billinger K., Trepels T., Zadan E., Horvath K., et al. Incidence and clinical course of thrombus formation on atrial septal defect and patient foramen ovale closure devices in 1,000 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Cardiol (2004) 43:302–309.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Mischke K., Schimpf T., Plisiene J., Soos P., Merkely B., Zarse M., et al. Transesophageal cardioversion via the TEE-probe: a new technique. PACE (2003) 26(part II):1030. (abstr.)
  53. Scholten M.F., Tunick P.A., Kerber R., Jordaens L.J., Roeland J.R., Kronzon I. Transesophageal cardioversion and transesophageal echocardiography using a combined probe: feasibility and safety. Circulation (2003) 108:IV-709. (abstr.)

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kühl, H.P.
Right arrow Articles by Hanrath, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kühl, H.P.
Right arrow Articles by Hanrath, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?