Skip Navigation

European Journal of Echocardiography 2007 8(6):416-417; doi:10.1016/j.euje.2007.07.006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saura, D.
Right arrow Articles by Valdés-Chávarri, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saura, D.
Right arrow Articles by Valdés-Chávarri, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2007, The European Society of Cardiology

Femoral versus antecubital vein contrast injection

Daniel Saura*, Gonzalo de la Morena and Mariano Valdés-Chávarri

Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Ctra. Murcia-Cartagena S/N, 30120 Murcia, Spain

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +34 657 30 12 39; fax: +34 968 36 95 58. danielsaura@secardiologia.es

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Dear Sir,

In their interesting narrative review about non-transpulmonary contrast echocardiography,1 Soliman et al. devoted a section to discuss the greater sensitivity of venous femoral injection of contrast for the detection of patent foramen ovale (PFO) as compared with venous brachial injection. This has been explained by intraatrial flow . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?