Copyright © 2005, The European Society of Cardiology
Screening for isolated diastolic dysfunction – a bridge too far?
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Northwick Park Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex, HA1 3UJ, UK
roxy.senior@virgin.net
* Corresponding author: Tel.: +44 208 869 2548; fax: +44 208 864 0075.
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Please see page 85 for the article by Nielsen et al. (doi: 10.1016/j.euje.2004.07.004) to which this editorial pertains.
| Introduction |
|---|
Advances in our ability to reduce the immediate mortality associated with acute coronary syndrome and hypertension have resulted in an inexorable increase in chronic myocardial dysfunction. In the United Kingdom
2% of the population have left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), which develops with an incidence of 10 per 1000 among persons older than 65 and is expanding in absolute terms with the demographic transition.1 The mortality of heart failure approaches 50% for patients with NYHA Class IV symptoms.2 Notable advances in the treatment of LVSD have resulted from widespread implementation of pharmacological, revascularisation, device and rehabilitation therapies; this is especially true if treatment is initiated early in the disease. An inevitable next step is therefore to extend and translate the successes of LVSD to identifying and treating its | What is the pathophysiological basis of diastolic heart failure? |
|---|
| What is the evidence that diastolic heart failure contributes to ill-health |
|---|
| How is LVDD most effectively identified? |
|---|
Related articles in Eur J Echocardiogr:
- Value of left ventricular filling parameters to predict mortality and functional class in patients with heart disease from the community
- Olav Wendelboe Nielsen, Ahmad Sajedieh, Frants Petersen, and Jørgen Fischer Hansen
Eur J Echocardiogr 2005 6: 85-91.[Abstract] [FREE Full Text]