Skip Navigation



European Journal of Echocardiography Advance Access published online on June 6, 2009

European Journal of Echocardiography, doi:10.1093/ejechocard/jep078
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
10/6/726    most recent
jep078v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaibazzi, N.
Right arrow Articles by Reverberi, C.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaibazzi, N.
Right arrow Articles by Reverberi, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2009. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Safety of contrast flash-replenishment stress echocardiography in 500 patients with a chest pain episode of undetermined origin within the last 5 days

Nicola Gaibazzi*, Angelo Squeri, Diego Ardissino and Claudio Reverberi

Heart Centre, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy

Received 11 March 2009; accepted after revision 16 May 2009.

* Corresponding author: Azienda Ospedaliero, Dipartimento Cardiopolmonare, Universitaria di Parma, U.O.Cardiologia, Via Gramsci, 14-43100 Parma, Italy. Tel: +39 052 196 7914. E-mail address: nicola.gaibazzi{at}inwind.it


   Abstract

Aims: Safety concerns regarding the use of echo-contrast agents during baseline and SE in patients with recent chest pain have been raised. The purpose of the present study was to provide evidence regarding the safety of flash-replenishment contrast dipyridamole–atropine echocardiography (DASE) in such patients.

Methods and results: Five hundred consecutive individuals who presented to the Emergency Department with chest pain, normal electrocardiograms (ECG) and troponin I were selected based on a less than 5 days interval between chest pain episode and performance of contrast flash-replenishment DASE. Analysis of myocardial perfusion with SonoVue© infusion after dipyridamole was routinely added on top of standard wall motion assessment during DASE. Adverse events (AEs) were reported according to standardized terminology and then compared with a historical control group in which contrast was not used. No deaths, myocardial infarctions, sustained arrhythmias, or any other life-threatening events were observed. Adverse events were not significantly different between the study group and the control group. In the selected subgroup of patients (n = 149) who underwent coronary angiography, accuracy of DASE with additional perfusion assessment was higher (88%, 95% C.I. 83–93%) than without (72%, 95% C.I. 65–79%).

Conclusion: DASE with SonoVue© infusion for myocardial perfusion assessment was exceptionally safe even when routinely performed within the first 5 days following a chest pain episode of undetermined origin in subjects without ECG and troponin abnormalities.

Keywords: Stress echocardiography; Dipyridamole; Chest pain; SonoVue; Contrast media


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
S. Kaul and K. Wei
When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth
Eur J Echocardiogr, August 1, 2009; 10(6): 713 - 715.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.