European Journal of Echocardiography Advance Access originally published online on September 10, 2007
European Journal of Echocardiography 2008 9(4):483-488; doi:10.1016/j.euje.2007.07.002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The influence of myocardial scar and dyssynchrony on reverse remodeling in cardiac resynchronization therapy
1 Department of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, P.O. Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
2 Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
3 Technical University of Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
4 Department of Psychology and Health, Medical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
5 Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Received 18 April 2007; accepted after revision 22 July 2007; online publish-ahead-of-print 10 September 2007.
* Corresponding author. Tel: +31 40 239 7004; fax: +31 40 244 7885. E-mail address: annemieke.jansen{at}cze.nl (A.H.M. Jansen).
| Abstract |
|---|
Aim: The influence of location and extent of transmural scar and its relation with dyssynchrony in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) was investigated as posterolateral scar tissue has been invoked as a cause of non-response to CRT.
Methods and results: Fifty-seven patients eligible for CRT were assessed for transmural scar with gadolinium-enhanced MRI and for left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony with tissue Doppler. After implant, both atrioventricular and interventricular pacing intervals were optimized. LV reverse remodeling was defined as
10% decrease in LV end-systolic volume after 3 months. Sixteen patients had transmural scar in the posterolateral (PL) area (LV lead location), 14 at a remote site (non-PL) and 27 patients had no scar. LV reverse remodeling was observed in respectively 25%, 64% and 89% (P = 0.0001). Univariate analyses showed a relation with LV dyssynchrony (P = 0.004) and with absence of PL scar (P = 0.04) but not with QRS duration and the extent of LV scar tissue. In multivariate analysis, only LV dyssynchrony (OR: 19.62; 95% CI: 2.5–151.9; P = 0.004) independently predicted LV reverse remodeling.
Conclusion: In this study LV dyssynchrony remains the most important determinant of response to CRT, even in the presence of posterolateral scar provided atrioventricular and interventricular pacing intervals are optimized.
Keywords: Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Heart failure; Magnetic resonance imaging; Echocardiography; Myocardial infarction