Skip Navigation

European Journal of Echocardiography 2008 9(4):415-437; doi:10.1093/ejechocard/jen175
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sicari, R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sicari, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2008. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Stress echocardiography expert consensus statement

European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC)

Rosa Sicari1,*, Petros Nihoyannopoulos2, Arturo Evangelista3, Jaroslav Kasprzak4, Patrizio Lancellotti5, Don Poldermans6, Jen-Uwe Voigt7, Jose Luis Zamorano8 on behalf of the European Association of Echocardiography

1 Institute of Clinical Physiology, Via G. Moruzzi, 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy
2 Hammersmith Hospital, NHLI, Imperial College London, UK
3 Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
4 Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
5 Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Sart Tilman, Liège, Belgium
6 Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
7 Instituto Cardiovascular, Catholic University, Leuven, Belgium
8 Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain

Received 11 May 2008; accepted after revision 11 May 2008.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +39 0503152397; fax: +39 0503152374.E-mail address: rosas{at}ifc.cnr.it


   Abstract

Stress echocardiography is the combination of 2D echocardiography with a physical, pharmacological or electrical stress. The diagnostic end point for the detection of myocardial ischemia is the induction of a transient worsening in regional function during stress. Stress echocardiography provides similar diagnostic and prognostic accuracy as radionuclide stress perfusion imaging, but at a substantially lower cost, without environmental impact, and with no biohazards for the patient and the physician. Among different stresses of comparable diagnostic and prognostic accuracy, semisupine exercise is the most used, dobutamine the best test for viability, and dipyridamole the safest and simplest pharmacological stress and the most suitable for combined wall motion coronary flow reserve assessment. The additional clinical benefit of myocardial perfusion contrast echocardiography and myocardial velocity imaging has been inconsistent to date, whereas the potential of adding – coronary flow reserve evaluation of left anterior descending coronary artery by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography adds another potentially important dimension to stress echocardiography. New emerging fields of application taking advantage from the versatility of the technique are Doppler stress echo in valvular heart disease and in dilated cardiomyopathy. In spite of its dependence upon operator's training, stress echocardiography is today the best (most cost-effective and risk-effective) possible imaging choice to achieve the still elusive target of sustainable cardiac imaging in the field of noninvasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Keywords: Stress echocardiography


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.