Skip Navigation

European Journal of Echocardiography 2007 8(5):341-345; doi:10.1016/j.euje.2006.06.007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turto, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kupari, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Turto, H.
Right arrow Articles by Kupari, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2006, The European Society of Cardiology

Doppler echocardiography markedly underestimates left ventricular stroke work loss in severe aortic valve stenosis

Heikki Turto, Jyri Lommi, Markku Ventilä and Markku Kupari*

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00029 Helsinki, Finland

Received 7 April 2006; received in revised form 3 June 2006; accepted after revision 15 June 2006.

markku.kupari{at}hus.fi

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +358 9 47172441; fax: +358 9 47174574.


  Abstract

Aims Left ventricular (LV) stroke work loss (SWL) is an index of aortic stenosis (AS) severity based on the energy loss concept. Traditionally known as an invasive measurement, SWL has also been determined noninvasively using Doppler echocardiography. The present work was done to compare the echocardiographic estimate against the standard invasive SWL.

Methods and results We determined SWL in 113 adult patients with AS at cardiac catheterization (mean gradient as percentage of the LV mean systolic pressure) and by Doppler echocardiography (mean gradient as percentage of the sum of systolic cuff blood pressure and mean gradient). SWL averaged 26.5±0.6% by echocardiography vs 30.9±0.8% by catheterization (p<0.0000001). The underestimation by echocardiography was the worse the higher the invasive SWL was (p<0.00001). Echocardiographic SWL exceeding 25% (previously suggested cutoff) had a sensitivity of 64% and specificity of 74% to identify severe AS (Gorlin valve area<0.5cm2/m2). Several patients with severe AS by valve area had echocardiographic SWL suggesting only mild AS.

Conclusions In AS, echocardiography gives a biased estimate of LV SWL with marked underestimation in severe disease. Echocardiographic SWL may confuse rather than improve the assessment of AS in clinical practice.

Keywords: Aortic valve stenosis; Stroke work loss; Doppler echocardiography


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.