Skip Navigation

European Journal of Echocardiography 2006 7(5):356-364; doi:10.1016/j.euje.2005.08.004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rojo, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by Macaya, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rojo, E. C.
Right arrow Articles by Macaya, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2005, The European Society of Cardiology

Disagreement between tissue Doppler imaging and conventional pulsed wave Doppler in the measurement of myocardial performance index

Eduardo Casas Rojo*, José Luis Rodrigo, Leopoldo Pérez de Isla, Carlos Almería, Nieves Gonzalo, Adalía Aubele, Rafael Cinza, José Zamorano and Carlos Macaya

Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto Cardiovascular, C/Professor Martín Lagos s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain

Received 27 April 2005; received in revised form 8 August 2005; accepted after revision 19 August 2005.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +34 91 669286904; fax: +34 91 3303293. ecasasweb{at}jazzfree.com


   Abstract

Aim Myocardial performance index (MPI) is usually measured with pulsed wave Doppler (PWD). Our aim was to assess the degree of agreement between PWD and a method based on tissue Doppler imaging (TDI).

Methods and results Seventy-five patients with prior myocardial infarction and 20 healthy subjects underwent measurement of time intervals and MPI with PWD and pulsed TDI at septal and lateral sides of mitral annulus. MPI and TDI-MPI at septal side showed the best intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC=0.54; p<0.0005). Ninety-five percent interval of agreement ranged from –0.27 to 0.22. These differences were attributed to discrepancies in isovolumic contraction and relaxation times. In the healthy group the results were similar (ICC=0.44), although the 95% interval of agreement was lower (from –0.13 to 0.12).

Conclusions The agreement between PWD and TDI in the measurement of MPI is only moderate. This should be taken into account in the interpretation of studies in which TDI is used for this measurement.

Keywords: Tissue Doppler imaging; Echocardiography; Tei index; Myocardial performance index


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.