Skip Navigation

European Journal of Echocardiography 2006 7(4):315-321; doi:10.1016/j.euje.2005.07.003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Modesto, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Abraham, T. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Modesto, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Abraham, T. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2005, The European Society of Cardiology

Two-dimensional acoustic pattern derived strain parameters closely correlate with one-dimensional tissue Doppler derived strain measurements

Karen M. Modestoa, Sanderson Cauduroa, Angela Dispenzierib, Bijoy Khandheriaa, Marek Belohlaveka, Peter Lysyanskyc, Zvi Friedmanc, Morie Gertzb and Theodore P. Abrahama,*

aDivision of Cardiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, United States
bDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, United States
cGE Ultrasound, Haifa, Israel

Received 17 January 2005; received in revised form 21 June 2005; accepted after revision 7 July 2005.

* Corresponding author. Johns Hopkins University, Cardiology Department, 600 North Wolfe Street, Carnegie 568, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States. Tel.: +1 410 955 6173; fax: +1 410 955 1509. tabraha3{at}jhmi.edu


   Abstract

Background Two-dimensional strain echocardiography (2D-SE) calculates tissue velocities via frame-to-frame tracking of unique acoustic markers within the image and provides strain parameters in two dimensions. Novel 2D-SE software allows semi-automated strain measurements and increased averaging capabilities optimizing signal–noise ratio.

Aim We tested whether 2D-SE and the currently used and well-validated tissue Doppler derived strain echocardiography (TD-SE) yield similar information in the clinical setting.

Methods and results We performed 2D-SE and TD-SE on 17 patients with amyloid cardiomyopathy and 10 age-matched healthy volunteers. Single walls from standard apical views (2- and 4-chamber) were acquired at high frame rates (~200fps). Offline analysis was performed by observers blinded to clinical data using the EchoPAC program with custom 2D-SE software. Longitudinal strain rate and strain from the basal, mid and apical segments of the septal and lateral walls were determined by each method (TD-SE and 2D-SE). Ejection fraction was >0.55 in healthy volunteers and ranged from 0.30 to 0.80 in cardiomyopathy group. A total of 54 walls (162 segments) were examined. Acceptable quality strain data was available in 92% and 85% segments by 2D-SE and TD-SE, respectively. Two-dimensional strain echocardiography values correlated closely with TD-SE values (r=0.94 and 0.96 for strain rate and strain, respectively).

Conclusions Deformation analysis by 2D-SE is feasible in a clinical setting and 2D-SE values correlate closely with TD-SE measurements over a wide range of global systolic function. Two-dimensional strain echocardiography may help to facilitate the routine clinical implementation of deformation analysis.

Keywords: Tissue Doppler; Strain; Two-dimensional strain echocardiography


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
D. Oxborough, A. M. Batterham, R. Shave, N. Artis, K. M. Birch, G. Whyte, P. N. Ainslie, and K. P. George
Interpretation of two-dimensional and tissue Doppler-derived strain ({varepsilon}) and strain rate data: is there a need to normalize for individual variability in left ventricular morphology?
Eur J Echocardiogr, July 1, 2009; 10(5): 677 - 682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
B. H. Bijnens, M. Cikes, P. Claus, and G. R. Sutherland
Velocity and deformation imaging for the assessment of myocardial dysfunction
Eur J Echocardiogr, March 1, 2009; 10(2): 216 - 226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
N. Takehara, Y. Tsutsumi, K. Tateishi, T. Ogata, H. Tanaka, T. Ueyama, T. Takahashi, T. Takamatsu, M. Fukushima, M. Komeda, et al.
Controlled Delivery of Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor Promotes Human Cardiosphere-Derived Cell Engraftment to Enhance Cardiac Repair for Chronic Myocardial Infarction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 2, 2008; 52(23): 1858 - 1865.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
M. Tomaske, J. Janousek, V. Razek, R. A. Gebauer, V. Tomek, G. Hindricks, W. Knirsch, and U. Bauersfeld
Adverse effects of Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome with right septal or posteroseptal accessory pathways on cardiac function
Europace, February 1, 2008; 10(2): 181 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
R. Hoffmann and M. Becker
Myocardial deformation to determine transmurality of myocardial infarction?: Reply
Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2007; 28(2): 269 - 270.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.