Skip Navigation

European Journal of Echocardiography 2006 7(4):284-292; doi:10.1016/j.euje.2005.06.004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thackray, S. D.R.
Right arrow Articles by Cleland, J. G.F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thackray, S. D.R.
Right arrow Articles by Cleland, J. G.F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2005, The European Society of Cardiology

The effect of ventricular pacing on measurements of left ventricular function: A comparison between echocardiographic methods and with radionuclide ventriculography*

Simon D.R. Thackraya,*, Graham A. Wrightb, Klaus K.A. Wittea, Nikolay P. Nikitina, Ann C. Tweddelb, Andrew L. Clarka and John G.F. Clelanda

aDepartment of Academic Cardiology, University of Hull, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, East Yorkshire, UK
bDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hull Royal Infirmary, Kingston-upon-Hull, UK

Received 10 May 2005; received in revised form 10 May 2005; accepted after revision 1 June 2005.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 1482 624073; fax: +44 1482 624084. simonthackray{at}hotmail.com


  Abstract

Aims Different methods exist for measuring left ventricular function echocardiographically; each may be error prone due to the abnormal pattern of ventricular activation during pacing.

Methods and results Echocardiography was undertaken on 307 patients with permanent pacemakers; a subset of 57 underwent radionuclide ventriculography. Intrinsic and paced beats were analysed for left ventricular function by: Simpson's bi-plane, Teicholz M-mode, wall-motion scoring and ‘eyeball’ assessment. Agreement between techniques and with radionuclide ventriculography were compared according to intrinsic or paced beats. Echocardiographic measures of ejection fraction give mean values 5% higher than radionuclide ventriculography (Simpson's 30±9%, vs. Teicholz 30±13% vs. radionuclide ventriculography 25±9%, p=0.03). Agreement between Simpson's, Teicholz and radionuclide ventriculography by Bland–Altman analysis showed poor agreement (Simpson's vs. Teicholz range (4xSD)=57%, Simpson's vs. radionuclide ventriculography=36%, Teicholz vs. radionuclide ventriculography=46%, p=0.02), the level of agreement deteriorates with ventricular pacing (Simpson's vs. Teicholz range=61%, Simpson's vs. radionuclide ventriculography=34%, Teicholz vs. radionuclide ventriculography=47%, p=0.02). The correlation between wall motion analysis and radionuclide ventriculography is moderately poor (all subjects r=0.58, ventricular pacing r=0.52, not pacing r=0.66).

Conclusion Echocardiography and radionuclide ventriculography are the only non-invasive techniques to assess left ventricular function in the paced population. Results are poorly interchangeable and the accuracy of any comparison dependent on the underlying rhythm.

Keywords: Pacemaker; Echocardiography; Heart failure

* This work is supported by the British Heart Foundation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.