Skip Navigation

European Journal of Echocardiography 2006 7(2):155-164; doi:10.1016/j.euje.2005.05.002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jeetley, P.
Right arrow Articles by Senior, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jeetley, P.
Right arrow Articles by Senior, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2005, The European Society of Cardiology

Stress echocardiography is superior to exercise ECG in the risk stratification of patients presenting with acute chest pain with negative Troponin

Paramjit Jeetley, Leah Burden and Roxy Senior*

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Northwick Park Hospital and Institute for Medical Research, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex HA1 3UJ, UK

Received 4 January 2005; received in revised form 28 April 2005; accepted after revision 11 May 2005.

* Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 208 869 2547; fax: +44 208 864 0075. roxy.senior{at}virgin.net


   Abstract

Objective To compare exercise electrocardiography (ExECG) and stress echocardiography (SE) in the risk stratification of patients presenting to hospital with cardiac-sounding chest pain, non-diagnostic ECGs and negative cardiac Troponin.

Methods Patients presenting with acute chest pain were prospectively randomised to early ExECG or SE. A post-test likelihood of CAD was determined by the pre-test likelihood and the result of the stress test. Patients with a low post-test likelihood of CAD were discharged; those with a high post-test probability were considered for coronary angiography. All others were managed according to standard hospital protocols.

Results A total of 302 patients underwent either ExECG or SE. SE identified significantly more patients with a low post-test probability of CAD (80% vs 31%, p<0.0001) and significantly fewer patients with an intermediate post-test likelihood of CAD compared to ExECG (3% vs 47%; p<0.0001). Significantly fewer patients undergoing SE were referred for further tests to exclude or refute the diagnosis of CAD (16% vs 52%; p<0.0001). In total, 36 (12%) had flow limiting CAD demonstrated by coronary angiography. Significant CAD was seen in fewer patients with a positive ExECG than with a positive SE (56% vs 84% (p=0.12)). Event rates were low for both modalities in patients with low post-test probability (3.5% for SE vs 5.1% for ExECG; p=ns) though the number of patients identified as low risk was higher if SE was performed.

Conclusion Despite negative cardiac Troponin, 12% of patients with acute chest pain had significant CAD. SE is superior to ExECG in discriminating between those patients with a low and intermediate risk of CAD and correctly identified patients with significant CAD, as well as conferring an excellent prognosis in those considered low risk. SE significantly reduces the requirement for further tests to diagnose CAD compared to ExECG.

Keywords: Stress echocardiography; Exercise echocardiography; Coronary artery disease; Prognosis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
N. Wennike, B. N. Shah, E. Boger, R. Senior, and K. Greaves
Stress echocardiography in the district hospital setting: a cost-saving analysis
Eur J Echocardiogr, January 11, 2010; (2010) jep223v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
L. A Pierard and P. Lancellotti
Echocardiography in the emergency room: Non-invasive imaging
Heart, January 15, 2009; 95(2): 164 - 170.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
R. Sicari, P. Nihoyannopoulos, A. Evangelista, J. Kasprzak, P. Lancellotti, D. Poldermans, J.-U. Voigt, J. L. Zamorano, and on behalf of the European Association of Echocardi
Stress echocardiography expert consensus statement: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC)
Eur J Echocardiogr, July 1, 2008; 9(4): 415 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Jeetley, L. Burden, B. Stoykova, and R. Senior
Clinical and economic impact of stress echocardiography compared with exercise electrocardiography in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome but negative troponin: a prospective randomized controlled study
Eur. Heart J., January 16, 2007; (2007) ehl444v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.