Skip Navigation

European Journal of Echocardiography 2005 6(6):435-442; doi:10.1016/j.euje.2005.01.003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kouris, N.
Right arrow Articles by Nihoyannopoulos, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kouris, N.
Right arrow Articles by Nihoyannopoulos, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2005, The European Society of Cardiology

Mitral valve repair versus replacement for isolated non-ischemic mitral regurgitation in patients with preoperative left ventricular dysfunction. A long-term follow-up echocardiography study

Nikos Kourisa,*, Ignatios Ikonomidisb, Dimitra Kontogiannia, Peter Smithb and Petros Nihoyannopoulosb

aWestern Attica General Hospital, Athens, Greece
bHammersmith Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK

Received 12 October 2004; received in revised form 15 January 2005; accepted after revision 21 January 2005.

nikoskou{at}otenet.gr

* Corresponding author. 4, Agiou Georgiou Street, 15236, N. Penteli, Athens, Greece. Tel.: +30 210 8041601; fax: +30 210 5698465.


   Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate LV function, by means of echocardiography, after mitral valve repair (MVr) or mitral valve replacement (MVR) in patients (pts) with chronic degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR) and depressed LV systolic function during a 6-years follow-up (FU) period.

Patients and methods

Forty-five pts with moderately severe or severe MR and preoperative EF≤50% were divided into 2 groups: MVr group (27 pts, 19 men–8 women, aged 62±10 years) and MVR group (18 pts, 8 men–10 women, aged 60±12 years). The cause of MR was myxomatous mitral valve disease (MVr/MVR: 16/8), endocarditis (0/4) and degenerative mitral valves with ruptured chordae tendineae (11/6). All pts underwent transthoracic echocardiography preoperatively, postoperatively and annually during the FU period (6±3 years).

Results

In MVr group, 5 pts died, 5 were lost to FU and 2 pts underwent MVR due to MVr failure. In MVR group, 6 pts died, 3 were lost to FU and 1 was re-operated due to prosthetic valve endocarditis. Atrial fibrillation was similar between the 2 groups. MVr pts demonstrated significant LVEDD decrease postoperatively which was persistent during FU (p<0.05). LVESD also decreased (p<0.05), VTI improved (p<0.05), while FS and EF showed a trend to improve. In MVR pts, LVEDD was decreased (p<0.05) but increased during FU (p<0.05) and LVESD remained high, resulting in a decrease of FS and EF (p<0.05). VTI remained unchanged (p=NS).

Conclusion

MVr in pts with non-ischemic MR and preoperative LV dysfunction achieves better preservation of LV systolic indices than MVR, probably due to preservation of the subvalvular apparatus and LV geometry.

Keywords: Mitral regurgitation; Depressed LV function; Mitral valve repair


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
S. D. Barnett and N. Ad
Surgery for aortic and mitral valve disease in the United States: A trend of change in surgical practice between 1998 and 2005.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., June 1, 2009; 137(6): 1422 - 1429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
F. Nicolini and T. Gherli
Alternatives to transplantation in the surgical therapy for heart failure
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2009; 35(2): 214 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.